Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Faerstein, E.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenshein, N. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Faerstein, E.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenshein, N. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 153, No. 1 : 11-19
Copyright © 2001 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Risk Factors for Uterine Leiomyoma: A Practice-based Case-Control Study. II. Atherogenic Risk Factors and Potential Sources of Uterine Irritation

Eduardo Faerstein1, Moyses Szklo2 and Neil B. Rosenshein3

1 Department of Epidemiology, Institute of Social Medicine, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
2 Department of Epidemiology, School of Hygiene and Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
3 Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.

In this case-control study, the authors analyzed associations of uterine leiomyoma with atherogenic risk factors and potential sources of uterine irritation. The study included 318 case women with uterine leiomyoma that was first confirmed between 1990 and 1993 in the Baltimore, Maryland, area and 394 controls selected from women visiting the same gynecologists' offices for routine reasons. Telephone interviews were conducted with 77.8% of eligible cases and 78.0% of eligible controls. Compared with participants with no hypertension history, increased risks were observed among participants with any history of hypertension (odds ratio (OR) = 1.7; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.0, 2.8), hypertension requiring medication (OR = 2.1; 95% CI: 1.1, 4.1), hypertension diagnosed at ages less than 35 years (for hypertension requiring medication, OR = 2.7; 95% CI: 1.0, 7.6), and hypertension of 5 or more years' duration (for hypertension requiring medication, OR = 3.1; 95% CI: 1.2, 8.2). Estimates of associations with diabetes history were very imprecise but followed similar patterns. Adjusted associations were observed with pelvic inflammatory disease (three or more episodes vs. none: OR = 3.7; 95% CI: 0.9, 15.9), chlamydial infection (history vs. no history: OR = 3.2; 95% CI: 0.8, 13.7), and use of an intrauterine device when it caused infectious complications (use vs. no use: OR = 5.3; 95% CI: 1.8, 16.3). Risk of uterine leiomyoma was also associated in a graded fashion with frequency of perineal talc use (daily use vs. no use: OR = 2.2; 95% CI: 1.4, 3.1). The authors conclude that nonhormonal factors may influence risk of uterine leiomyoma.

adnexitis; case-control studies; hypertension; intrauterine devices; irritants; leiomyoma; risk factors; uterine diseases

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; IUD, intrauterine device; PID, pelvic inflammatory disease; UL, uterine leiomyoma


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Isobe, T. Takeda, M. Sakata, A. Miyake, T. Yamamoto, R. Minekawa, F. Nishimoto, Y. Oskamoto, C. L. Walker, and T. Kimura
Dual repressive effect of angiotensin II-type 1 receptor blocker telmisartan on angiotensin II-induced and estradiol-induced uterine leiomyoma cell proliferation
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2008; 23(2): 440 - 446.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
D. D. Baird, J. S. Kesner, and D. B. Dunson
Luteinizing Hormone in Premenopausal Women May Stimulate Uterine Leiomyomata Development
Reproductive Sciences, February 1, 2006; 13(2): 130 - 135.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
R. Boynton-Jarrett, J. Rich-Edwards, S. Malspeis, S. A. Missmer, and R. Wright
A Prospective Study of Hypertension and Risk of Uterine Leiomyomata
Am. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2005; 161(7): 628 - 638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
D. D. Baird
Invited Commentary: Uterine Leiomyomata--We Know So Little but Could Learn So Much
Am. J. Epidemiol., January 15, 2004; 159(2): 124 - 126.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
R. Luoto, E. Faerstein, and M. Szklo
RE: "RISK FACTORS FOR UTERINE LEIOMYOMA: A PRACTICE-BASED CASE-CONTROL STUDY. II. ATHEROGENIC RISK FACTORS AND POTENTIAL SOURCES OF UTERINE IRRITATION"
Am. J. Epidemiol., January 15, 2002; 155(2): 187 - 187.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
E. Faerstein, M. Szklo, and N. Rosenshein
Risk Factors for Uterine Leiomyoma: A Practice-based Case-Control Study. I. African-American Heritage, Reproductive History, Body Size, and Smoking
Am. J. Epidemiol., January 1, 2001; 153(1): 1 - 10.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
S. M. Schwartz
Invited Commentary: Studying the Epidemiology of Uterine Leiomyomata--Past, Present, and Future
Am. J. Epidemiol., January 1, 2001; 153(1): 27 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.