Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Daniels, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Blatt, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Daniels, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Blatt, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 153, No. 12 : 1227-1232
Copyright © 2001 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


PRACTICE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY

Comparison of Assessment Methods for Pesticide Exposure in a Case-Control Interview Study

Julie L. Daniels1, Andrew F. Olshan2, Kay Teschke3, Irva Hertz-Picciotto2, David A. Savitz2 and Julie Blatt4

1 Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC.
2 Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
3 Department of Health Care Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
4 Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.

In epidemiologic studies, much of the variation in disease risk estimates associated with occupational pesticide exposure may be due to variation in exposure classification. The authors compared five different methods of using interview information to assess occupational pesticide exposure in a US-Canada case-control study of neuroblastoma (1992–1994). For each method, exposure assignment was compared with that of a reference method, and neuroblastoma effect estimates were calculated. Compared with the reference method, which included a complete review of occupation, industry, job tasks, and exposure-specific activities, the use of occupation-industry groups alone or in combination with general job task information diluted the exposed group by including individuals who were unlikely to have been truly exposed. The effect estimates representing associations between each exposure method and neuroblastoma were different enough to influence the study's conclusions, especially when the exposure was rare (for maternal occupational pesticide exposure, the odds ratio was 0.7 using the reference exposure assessment method and 3.2 using the occupation-industry group exposure assessment method). Exposure-specific questions about work activities can help investigators distinguish truly exposed individuals from those who report exposure but are unlikely to have been exposed above background levels and from those who have not been exposed but are misclassified as exposed because of their employment in an occupation-industry group determined a priori to be exposed.

case-control studies; child; epidemiologic methods; interviews; neoplasms; neuroblastoma; occupational exposure; pesticides

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; IH, industrial hygiene; OR, odds ratio


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.